Live numbers from 5 roster scans — they update with every re-scan, and scores sharpen as history accumulates.
What moves the score
Every point is explainable — each watchlist row shows its reasons in plain English.
- Office bleed up to +30 (scaled by the office’s departure rate) Colleagues leaving the same office is the strongest known predictor of an agent’s own move.
- Teammate departed up to +25 (flat) Teams follow their leavers. Team = agents sharing a phone line or a team email domain.
- Network bleeding up to +15 (scaled by the network’s net loss rate) The whole brand is losing agents in the window, not just this office.
- Personal email up to +12 (flat) A gmail/hotmail address is less anchored to the brokerage than a franchise mailbox.
- Changed email up to +8 (flat) A recent address change is a common pre-move tell.
- Just moved brokerages −25 A fresh mover is settled for now — the score is suppressed, not boosted, no matter what else is true.
- Production tier / awards / broker title 0 Shown on every row, never scored. How good an agent is says nothing about whether they’ll move.
Sum of the caps is 90; the score is clamped to 100 and rows under 20 don’t make the watchlist. Every point carries its reason in plain English on the row it belongs to.
The math your recruiter already knows
One producing agent is worth tens of thousands a year in splits to the brokerage that lands them — and recruiting is won in the two weeks around a move, before the grapevine catches up. Radar exists to point your recruiter at the right fifty conversations instead of the whole phone book. It pays for itself the first time it's early.
The full movability watchlist with contact details and reasons, region filters, the bleeding-offices board, team alerts — plus everything in Brokerage Intel (league tables, move feed, net-change standings). Cancel any time.
After checkout, sign in at /account with your purchase email. Just want the movement history? Brokerage Intel is $99/mo.
Questions
How can you know an agent is likely to move?
We re-scan the public rosters of 24 Canadian brokerage networks and independents every two to three weeks and keep the full history. The strongest predictor of a move is what’s happening around the agent: colleagues leaving the same office, a teammate departing, a network bleeding agents in their market, plus individual tells like a changed email address. Each agent gets a 0–100 movability score built from exactly those signals — and every reason is shown, so you can judge the evidence yourself.
What do I actually see?
A ranked national watchlist (filterable by region): agent name, brokerage, city, production tier, the score, and the plain-English reasons behind it — plus a board of the offices currently losing the most agents, and flags for team members whose teammates just left. Full contact details are included on every row.
How accurate is it this early?
Honestly: the scores sharpen with history. Signals like office bleed and team departures need repeated scans to accumulate — the model gets noticeably smarter every Monday. We also aggressively filter scrape noise: when a network re-organizes its roster pages, we detect and discard the phantom "departures" instead of letting them inflate scores.
How is this different from Brokerage Intel?
Intel ($99/mo) tells you what already happened — who moved, which networks gained and lost. Radar ranks who is likely to move next, so your recruiter calls before the industry hears it. Radar includes everything in Intel.
Can I cancel any time?
Yes — monthly billing through Stripe, no contract. Reply to any email from us and we cancel same day.